CF Dictionary · Knowledge & Epistemology
Authoritarianism (epistemic)
The epistemic view that some source — tradition, authority, or revelation — provides certain knowledge. CF rejects this.
Epistemic authoritarianism is the view that some source — a person, an institution, a tradition, a sacred text — can deliver knowledge that is certain or specially authoritative. CF, with CR, rejects all forms:
- Authoritarian rulers. "The king knows."
- Majority opinion. "Everyone agrees, so it must be true."
- Expert deference. "Trust the expert." (See appeal-to-authority.)
- Religious authority. "The text says."
- Ideology. "The Party is correct."
Why CF rejects authoritarianism
- It violates fallibilism. No source is infallible.
- It blocks error-correction. Criticism is silenced.
- It violates content-based judgment. Ideas should be judged by their arguments, not their source.
- The history is catastrophic. Authoritarian epistemology is the parent of authoritarian politics.
The CF replacement
CF replaces deference with Paths Forward: anyone can offer criticism, and you evaluate it by content, not by who said it.
"Ideas should be judged by their content, not their source." — criticalfallibilism.com