CF Dictionary · Evaluating Ideas & Arguments
Argument
In CF, an argument is a chain of reasoning offered in favour of (positive) or against (negative) an IGC.
In CF, an argument is a piece of reasoning offered for or against an IGC. Arguments come in two kinds, positive and negative, and are further classified as decisive or indecisive.
CF's four-way classification
| Positive | Negative | |
|---|---|---|
| Decisive | contradicts "IGC false"; rare/impossible | contradicts "IGC true"; refutes |
| Indecisive | doesn't refute or decisively prove | doesn't refute; counts as nothing |
CF accepts negative decisive arguments (refutations) as the workhorse of rational discourse. Everything else is either inaccessible or has no evidential weight in CF.
What arguments are not
- A bare assertion is not an argument. You must give reasons.
- An appeal to authority is not a CF argument — see appeal-to-authority.
- An argument is not a "weight" or "score". Arguments either refute an IGC or they don't.
"Decisive arguments are better than indecisive arguments, and most or all of our decisive arguments are negative." — criticalfallibilism.com